Secrets to Success: Manlius - The Art Of The Reload

Finding New Talent Among The Ranks


One of the most significant factors in the continued success of Manlius is their ability to "call up" athletes when needed.  The team has had the unique ability to create something from nothing.  While the typical trajectory for a female athlete starts high in freshman year, and peters out the furthering of her career, FM sees the opposite.  Instead, their females find a trajectory more closely resembling those of males, a more gradual increase over four years.

The ability to transition athletes from participant to contributor is one of the keys to Manlius' staying power.  When looking at a state like New York, in a sample size of twenty years, most teams experience small peaks in performance, with larger valleys.  This is generally due to the emergence of a singular talented athlete, with which a coach can build a team around.  The effect is felt for a year or two, and then a new talent arises to take their place.  The dynasties arise when programs surpass this trend, finding continued success year over year.  Names like Saratoga, East Aurora, and Bronxville come to mind.

Manlius has since joined that pantheon in 2004, and smashed the stereotype in the process.  They have survived 3 full rounds of graduations, 4 years a piece.  Instead of banking on the unknown (incoming freshman), Manlius has developed the present.  Each year, a minimum of two athletes are retrofitted into scorers, adding a minimum of 10pts to their present personal bests. These are seen in the significant "bumps" in their speed rating averages, year over year.

How they continue to find untapped talent within their small ranks remains a secret of their training, only adding to the intrigue behind the most dominant program in recent memory.  Their team enrollment never exceeds more than 30 athletes, between the two programs.

Fast Facts

  • The average improvement for a varsity runner during their breakout (bump) year is 16 points (48 seconds).
  • Runners are equally able to improve, despite their grade.  Improvement by grade jump: 8-->9 (10%), 9-->10 (34%), 10-->11 (24%), 11-->12 (31%)
  • Underclassmen runners will typically average another bump the year following their breakout, about 50% of the original bump.
  • bumps will typically occur regardless of team depth in a specific year.

Key - 1pt is equal to a 3second improvement over 5000m

Average is the total weighted average at the end of the regular season, not including NXN Regionals or NXN

Biggest Jump Year-Over-Year


NameGrade ChangeYearImprovement
Christie Rutledge 10 --> 11201056pts
Sam Levy 10 --> 11201435pts
Sophie Ryan 8 --> 9201433pts
Palmer Madsen 9 --> 10201529pts
Alana Pearl 9 --> 10201127pts
Courtney Chapman 8 --> 9200720pts
Kaitlyn Neal 11 --> 122015 Transfer20pts
Brittany Crawford 11 --> 12200319pts
Megan Menz 9 --> 10201317pts
Michelle Duffy 11 --> 12201217pts
Olivia Ryan 11 --> 12201417pts
Catie Caputo 10 --> 11200516pts
Jessica Howe 10 --> 11201316pts
Meaghan Anklin 11 --> 12200816pts
Courtney Chapman 9 --> 10200815pts
Molly Malone 9 --> 10200715pts
Katie Brislin 9 --> 102010 Transfer14pts
Amanda Eisenson 11 --> 12200813pts
Katie LoSecco 10 --> 11200213pts
Colleen Englert 11 --> 12201111pts
Mackenzie Pierie 11 --> 12201411pts
Meaghan Anklin 10 --> 11200711pts
Hilary Hooley 9 --> 10200410pts
Jillian Fanning 9 --> 10201010pts
Kathryn Buchan 10 --> 11200710pts
Katie Sischo 9 --> 10200910pts
Annika Avery 9 --> 1020129pts
Maggie Malone 8 --> 920109pts
Jessica Hauser 11 --> 1220068pts