TullyRunners Releases Girls State Team Preseason Report



Via Bill Meylan

Girls - Potential Top Overall Contenders & Class Contenders

Pre-season team rankings have problems: ... first, they are based (in large part) on last year's results ... more recent track results may or may not have relevance for the upcoming XC season ... some runners improve (some improve a lot) ... a few runners transfer or quit ... new runners can join a team and make a big difference ... So any pre-season rankings must be viewed in that context.

What good are pre-season rankings?
 (1) a fun topic of conversation during the summer
 (2) beneficial in gathering background information for the upcoming season


Once the XC season starts, I rank individual runners and teams based strictly on performance during the current season ... So pre-season rankings are not used during the season.


To a large extent, the team listing below is just an extension of the 2015 XC season into 2016 with a few modifications ... IF data for 5 runners on each team was not readily available (or guess-able), that team is probably NOT included below ... With rare exceptions, I ignored last year's modified runners.


I limited the Combined Class list to 37 teams after starting with 70+ teams.


Remember ... this list is just an informational starting point ... I posted scores by individual class because some people are interested ... A lot can change between mid-July and November.


  New York GIRLS Teams - Combined Classes 2016


[ Combined Teams ] .. [ Class A ] .. [ Class B ] .. [ Class C ] .. [ Class D ] .. [ CHSAA - AIS - PSAL ]


                   Pre-Season Projection - New York Girls Team Contenders - 2016


         ---------------------------------------
              Scores Using Top 37 Teams
         ---------------------------------------
                                         Section-
         Team                   Score     Class
         ---------------------  -----    --------

    1    Fayetteville-Manlius     75     (03-A )
    2    Saratoga                 90     (02-A )
    3    North Rockland          190     (01-A )
    4    Guilderland             315     (02-A )
    5    Monroe-Woodbury         320     (09-A )
    6    Corning                 375     (04-A )
    7    Shenendehowa            380     (02-A )
    6    Webster Thomas          395     (05-A )
    9    Pearl River             405     (01-B )
    10   Shoreham Wading River   405     (11-B )
    11   Colonie                 425     (02-A )
    12   Niskayuna               480     (02-A )
    13   Rush-Henrietta          490     (05-A )
    14   Clarence                500     (06-A )
    15   Syosset                 505     (08-A )
    16   John Jay CR             510     (01-B )
    17   East Aurora             510     (06-B )
    18   Elmira District         545     (04-A )
    19   Burnt Hills             550     (02-B )
    20   West Genesee            565     (03-A )
    21   Pittsford Sutherland    570     (05-B )
    22   Suffern                 585     (01-A )
    23   Sachem East             600     (11-A )
    24   Bronxville              610     (01-C )
    25   Greenwich               615     (02-D )
    26   West Seneca West        615     (06-A )
    27   Bayport-Blue Pt         620     (11-B )
    28   Canandaigua             620     (05-B )
    29   Warwick Valley          635     (09-A )
    30   Notre Dame Academy      635     (CHSAA)
    31   Ithaca                  640     (04-A )
    32   Newfane                 640     (06-C )
    33   Honeoye Falls-Lima      640     (05-B )
    34   Conv Sacred Heart       645     (AIS  )
    35   Pittsford Mendon        650     (05-B )
    36   Queensbury              655     (02-A )
    37   Fairport                670     (05-A )


Where did the scores come from? ... In part, the scores are a composite of computer race simulations using 2015 seasonal speed ratings ... a few speed ratings were altered based on track results ... I manually manipulated some numbers because I wanted to ... and then adjusted final scores for various reasons.


Note ... The scores are simply my pre-season "guess" of relative team abilities in a combined race ... I included 37 teams to show some depth.


In General ... The top three teams, Fayetteville-Manlius, Saratoga and North Rockland, are the three New York teams that competed at NXN Nationals last year ..... Fayetteville-Manlius is the defending NXN National champion and FM has won 9 of the last 10 NXN National titles ... Overall, I give Fayetteville-Manlius the advantage because of their winning tradition and an ability to reload ... Saratoga is typically deep in talent.


The uncertainty factors include the ability to reload effectively and the impact of new runners, either expected or otherwise ... My term for this is "new blood" (e.g. soccer transfers, first time XC runners, etc) which I discussed in an article 9 years ago ... For example, how much of an impact will new runners have for FM and Saratoga?? ... How much will returning XC runners improve from last year?? ... What about effective team depth or the impact of an injury/illness??


Fayetteville-Manlius, Saratoga and North Rockland have additional comments below in the Class A section.


Additional comments and information are given below by class ... Class consideration is important in the pre-season because it impacts far more runners than projections intended for Federation Championships or the NXN-NY regional qualifier.